The Official Website of Josh Gillespie

Richard Mourdock’s Abortion Comments and Joe Donnelly’s Sophistry

This week, I pulled double duty on WIBC.  First I made my regular pre-presidential debate visit.  The Presidential debate came and went. Most of us who watched it were probably fighting sleep as it failed to yield the fireworks the previous two Presidential debates and the vice presidential debates did.  But leave it to my home state and a good old fashioned Senate debate to liven things up for the week and bring me back.

As you may have heard, Richard Mourdock made some comments regarding abortion as it pertains to rape, pregnancies and God intentions.  Not exactly the subject Republican male senate candidates should probably be commenting on.  However, the response was swift and  full of misinterpretation while Democrats have cried in faux outrage claiming that Richard Mourdock is Todd Akin 2.0.  That observation is completely absurd.   Here is my exchange.



As Jennifer Rubin of the Washington Post notes:

Mourdock is not Todd Akin (who offered his idiotic non-scientific view that a pregnancy can’t result from rape). And Akin, for all the attention showered on him at the Democratic convention and by the media, has not harmed Romney one bit. In this case Romney has said he doesn’t share Mourdock’s view. I don’t expect he’ll have anything to say further, and if he does, he’s nuts. The president who can’t be bothered to answer questions about four Americans murdered on his watch and his serial prevarication says Mourdock’s comments were “outrageous.” What does that tell you about his character?

This should also tell you the priorities of Joe Donnelly. At this point in the race, with Mitt Romney and Mike Pence running away with their elections (in Indiana at least) Donnelly needed a distraction and unfortunately, Richard Mourdock gave him one. Donnelly doesn’t want to talk about his multiple votes to raise the debt limit, or his support for the bank bailouts or the Obama stimulus package or for Obamacare or his support for a President who is on the record for supporting infanticide and voting against support for rape victims.

No, Joe Donnelly would rather have you avoid looking at the man behind the curtain while also avoiding the gigantic hole in his (and others who claim “my God wouldn’t allow…”) so-called religious views.  James Taranto of the Wall Street Journal notes:

As an analytical matter, however, Mourdock’s statement is entirely defensible, whereas Akin’s is sophistry. And it turns out that Mourdock’s Democratic opponent, in seeking to capitalize on the remark, is engaging in Akin-style sophistry.

Donnelly, seeking to capitalize on the kerfuffle, “put out a statement attacking Mourdock,” the Hill reports:

“I think rape is a heinous and violent crime in every instance,” Donnelly said in the statement. “The God I believe in and the God I know most Hoosiers believe in does not intend for rape to happen–ever. What Mr. Mourdock said is shocking, and it is stunning that he would be so disrespectful to survivors of rape.”

Donnelly is engaging in some sleazy innuendo here. Mourdock’s assertion about what “God intended” clearly referred to conception (“when life begins”), not rape.

But what’s interesting about Donnelly’s statement is that he claims to agree with Mourdock’s central premises: that God exists, and that unborn children are human beings worthy of legal protection (or, as the Hill puts it, Donnelly “is also against abortion rights”). Donnelly differs from Mourdock only in reaching the opposite conclusion on the specific question of a rape exception.

Donnelly, however, is as dismissive of the question as Akin. He professes a belief in God yet appears never to have grappled with the problem of evil. Surely “the God . . . most Hoosiers believe in” is omnipresent, yet he is somehow AWOL, in Donnelly’s theodicy, anytime a woman is raped.

Democrats and their pundits have their “radical, extremist and out-of-touch” talking points, but all they are trying to do is pivot away from the issues, such as jobs and the economy, that matter most to Hoosiers.  And by avoiding the real issues, that shows just how out of touch they really are.


Share and Enjoy

Tags: , , ,

2 Comments to "Richard Mourdock’s Abortion Comments and Joe Donnelly’s Sophistry"

  1. RichardDuth says:

    Although it is not enough roshe run homme rouge in return nike free run pas cher a circle nike free run 5.0 pas cher to press Nike Free Run Femme Pas Cher history, Adidas has managed to be experiencing this information Nike Free Run 2 Pas Cher without getting stale. One-liner reason why they drink roshe run homme rouge not been “past” and that unattended nike free run pas cher is that they are docile nike free run 5.0 pas cher to devise Nike Free Run Femme Pas Cher changes wholly Nike Free Run 2 Pas Cher acquisitions unvarying if they are risky. Although it has created some problems as regards roshe run homme rouge Adidas in the close by, charming nike free run pas cher in risky acquisitions (instances nike free run 5.0 pas cher at the guidance of investors and vend analysts) has been incredibly helpful, particularly in the case of its acquiring of Salomon.Homeostasis. That’s a gingerbread way to disclose cheap nike air max equilibrium, and it’s what your hull craves, methodical nike air max sale more than salt and vinegar potato chips. even nike air max sale 18 year olds, were expected to tediously tire nike air max womens a “blouse” which looked a scrap like a hairdresser’s blanket nike free run pas cher femme or a peasant free run pas cher smock.Like Carlson, I trouble there nike free run 2 femme pas cher what my kids watch. I don demand nike free run femme my children exposed to images or ideas that would mastery them to be by way of nike free run 5.0 or abruptly nike free run pas cher femme or desensitized to ferocity free run pas cher and its consequences. I likewise don neediness nike free run 2 femme pas cher my daughters to pick up any notions from the media that they procure nike free run femme to be skinny or bedroom or downplay their shrewdness nike free run 5.0 to be liked.The “Waffle” is a slimmed down somewhat nike free run pas cher femme less priceless shoe in similarity free run pas cher with the Nike “Mastery”. Relieve nike free run 2 femme pas cher having a breathable grid nobles nike free run femme, and a lightweight effervescence midsole, this shoe differs from others next to nike free run 5.0 having a 4 pike plate. It is up to the miler nike free run pas cher femme to conclusion which is pre-eminent nike air max 90 homme against him or her.III. Organization nike air max 90 pas cher of Representatives Wisconsin delegation, every Republican (6 total) voted against a note nike air max pas cher that would taboo nike free run pas cher femme employers from difficult the passwords of employees communal nike free run pas cher network/media sites, such as Facebook. The three Wisconsin Democrats voted for nike air max 90 homme the bill.Lucent technologies was from the outset, an branch nike air max pas cher of AT The firm achieved uncommon nike free run pas cher femme good totally redesign of the distribute nike free run pas cher limit, after nike air max 90 homme their flagship produce, the 5ESS digital switch. The 5ESS alteration nike air max 90 pas cher was a large nike air max pas cher gamut, software based digital platform nike free run pas cher femme, which provided communications service to nike free run pas cher any genus of signal all about any medium. It connected end nike air max 90 homme users to median nike air max 90 pas cher phone offices and phone offices to each other.In the 1990s.….

  2. Tiara says:

    I read a lot of interesting content here. Probably you spend a lot of time writing,
    i know how to save you a lot of work, there is an online tool that creates high quality,
    google friendly posts in seconds, just search in google
    - laranitas free content source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>